Mesorat%20hashas for Eruvin 47:3

כמאן כרבנן

but [if it was] two beth se'ah [the movement of objects within the entire area] is forbidden.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because the sown portion has the status of a karpaf that was not enclosed for dwelling purposes. Such a karpaf, provided it is not bigger than two beth se'ah, is a permitted domain only where it is not abutting on any other domain; but here, since it opens out into a kind of courtyard, one side of which is fully exposed to it, the two domains are a mutual cause of prohibition, and no object may be carried from the one into the other.');">⁶</span> In agreement with whose view?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Was R. Huna's statement made.');">⁷</span> - In agreement with that of the Rabbis.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who hold that two domains, though they are the property of one man and though none is inhabited, may be a mutual cause of prohibition (cf. infra 8) .');">⁸</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Eruvin 47:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.